Alright, so here are the last responses I had to type up for the homework part of my Palestine/Israel trip. We had to write about three different things that have really made us think and change our perceptions that we have learned or experienced since coming to this land. Below are the three things that have truly made me think the past two weeks and what tore down my beliefs and thoughts. Read them if you want to.
1. I always thought that Palestinians had an ingrained sense of hatred and resentment against the Jews and Israelis for invading their lands and pushing them out. That feeling and thinking intensified when as I talked to the people of Jordan and what they thought of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. I thought that the divide and frustration would be even greater here. I was stunned to learn the complete opposite. Palestinians here are much more accepting of the Israelis and the Israeli state. Jordanians wanted to push all the Jews back into the sea and get revenge for all the wrongdoings and wars. Here, I feel Palestinians just want freedoms and autonomy. They are more than willing to let Israel exist if Israel will just leave them alone. I think that is an extremely valid request. This has given me a lot more hope that there will be a solution to the conflict in the future. It isn't just some pie-in-the-sky dream, but an achievable goal. I also learned that refugees (like the Jordanians) will be harder to satiate in the long run than the people who still live here. They carry with them a much bigger burden in the form of rage, desire for revenge, and longing. I also think because they don't have personal experience interacting with the Jews that they do not have the opportunity to overcome their prejudices and stereotypes.
2. On the flip side, I also learned this past week that there are a number of Israelis who are trying to gain Palestinians their basic human rights. There are a group of people who have broken through the stereotypes, biased media, and indoctrinated brainwashing to see the Palestinians as their human brothers and someone to be respected instead of feared and reviled. This has also given me hope that in the future more and more people will see an actual representation of the truth and see people as they really are and not vilify all of them as monsters based on history or the actions of a few. People need to have personal experience to see each other as people and I have to believe that more and more people will take the opportunity to do so. This also has taught me that people form their own realities. Their perception of themselves and the world and their place in it leads to their actions, their identities, and their way of life. All the different people that we have listened to or talked with view in the world in a different way. In order to build bridges between people, you have to go out into their realities and show them the way to a different one where they share certain characteristics with people that they didn't know about.
3, Sacred to me? That is a great question. I find that anything that makes me stop and think and reflect and change my behavior for the better in order to become closer to God is sacred to me. I think that might be a broader definition than most because I revere a lot of things as "sacred". In order for something to become "sacred" to me, I need time to digest what is happening, how it fits into my life and frame of mind, what it means to me, and what it means to others (and thereby by extension what it can mean to me if I want to accept their realm of perception). On this trip, we hustled through so many sites so fast that I could scarcely take everything in, let alone find time to put it in context of my life and perceptions or others'. However, I was able to find the time to contemplate at a few sites where I did find the holiness and sacredness of it. One in particular was the tomb edifice at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher. Kaylie, Yao Yao, and I went back when we had free time in order to see the Armenian part of the church with its big mosaic. We were surprised to find that the church was relatively empty and that there was absolutely no line for the tomb whatsoever. We walked right in (partially at the insistence of the Orthodox priest that kept pestering us). I expected to find the same gaudy decorations as everywhere else and admire it more for its aesthetic and architectural significance instead of its purported holiness. We were inside the tomb for about 8 minutes before anyone else even wanted to come in. It isn't very big, so I had a lot of time to think. I was overcome by the Spirit as I pondered the Savior and His mission and recognized that all the decorations were to venerate in the best way that these people knew how. It was a very moving experience. I also had a similar experience at the Garden of Gethsemane today because we were given 30 minutes to wonder and ponder. I was able to get in touch with the meaning of the place for me and have my testimony strengthened of the Savior, His mission, and the Atonement. Those being considered, I will also admit great works or art or literature also move me in a similar way. If I can look at something and ponder about it or read something and sit quietly afterwards thinking what it all means or what greater understanding I have come to, then it becomes "sacred" to me. It gets me in touch the with Spirit and a better understanding of God and His creations. That is what sacred it to me.
Saturday, December 20, 2014
Friday, December 19, 2014
More Response Papers
Mori Anti-Settlement Lecture
I enjoyed the stories that Mori shared about the change of his views on the Israeli/Palestinian issue and especially concerning settlements. I like how he described that Jewish children are indoctrinated as they are brought up and encouraged to join the army but they don't think what being in the army will actually entail until later. And then they follow orders largely without questioning. I agree with his views on the situation that it is amazing what people will accept and what orders they will follow depending on the information that they have been given. I think it can be extremely hard for people to break out of the bubbles that they or that society has created for them and as a result they are blind to the consequences of certain policies, ideals, or dehumanizations as the case may be. Be that as it may, it is still definitely wrong to kick people out of their houses. I agree that living populations should take precedence over the archaelogical diggings that may lay underneath them. If you started digging anywhere in this area, you are bound to find ruins. If they kick out the Palestinians for that reason, they also need to kick out Jewish families for the same reason. I am amazed at the optimism that Mori held despite the fact that he acknowledged that he is only (hopefully) laying the groundwork for future change. I don't know if there is a way in the immediate future to bring about a resolution to the conflict and the deep-seated mistrust that exists between the two sides. One way to start though is to have things clearly represented as what they are. I recognize that Mori was definitely far to one side in the argument, but at least he admitted his bias. The movie we watched yesterday about the City of David was a piece of heavy propaganda but it never admitted to being so. It only sought to indoctrinate and to brainwash. I like that he at least came out and stated several times that there are differing opinions and the he doesn't necessarily know the right way to do things. It made his ideas a lot easier to listen to.
Leah Settlement Lecture
These two lecture back-to-back was probably the highlight of all the many lectures that we have received on this trip so far. It was amazing to see the contrast in the discourses that each side presented. Each individual side believes that it is entirely correct and it makes logical sense to them why they carry out the actions that they do. They feel justified in their reasonings and in their decisions. Leah's lecture made a great deal of sense and I had to say I could see where she was coming from for the vast majority of her arguments and the information that she presented. Her reversal on the right to return and being kicked out definitely turned the Palestinian discourse a little bit. Jews were kicked out by Palestinians and Jordanians and were forced to flee under armed guard to other areas. They were exercising something like their right to return when they came back (although it wasn't necessarily the same family or even same community that moved back into the houses and they won't let the Palestinians have the same privilege so the parallel is weak at best). She had a good argument for everything that the other side would usually point out - Jews bring greater stability to an area because of the armed presence and the cameras, Jews bring prosperity and cleanliness, a melting pot city does have a nice ring to it when compared to being divided by barbed wire. However, all these were taken from her context and frame-of-view. I think it would be incredibly interesting to bring her and Mori together in a formal debate to go back and forth to see if they could get each other to see any of the other's points. I think there has to be a compromise made between the two sides somehow in order to reach any sort of agreement. I have to say that I agree way more with the Palestinian side and think they have been hugely mistreated and murdered and taken advantage of in every case. However, in order to reach stability and peace some amount of that has to be forgiven and moved past. I don't know where the balance would be though or even how to reach that point where the two sides would come into balance.
Peace Process Lecture
If anything, this peace process lecture given by both of you only cemented the fact that there is no immediate or easy end to this conflict or multi-faceted issue. There have been so many peace processes and semi-agreements that have gotten nowhere or had very little impact or result. People hold on to old treaties or ideals from past peace processes that seem to have little modern application anymore at this point. But they stubbornly hold on to somehow making them work at some point. But I wonder at what cost? When will people have to realize that a certain solution has become highly improbable and what point does the current situation reflect that reality? I think a two state solution might still be possible, but the way things are headed it certainly looks a lot more difficult than it ever did about twenty years ago. I have doubts about a two state solution though. For one thing, there would have to be a more equitable distribution of resources, especially water. Water is an extremely valuable commodity in this part of the world and Israel uses quite a bit. Palestine would have to be guaranteed a greater share in order to provide for the needs of its people. I don't know if Israel would really be willing to even make that concession to them if the time ever came to do so. Also, both sides would need a more equitable security force in order to keep the other from future invasions or armed border conflicts. I don't think Israel would allow Israel would allow Palestine to do that and would be ready to invade and reoccupy Palestine at any point in order to regain its hegemony, security, land, and resources. The two states might last for a little while, but I think eventually the system would collapse.
I enjoyed the stories that Mori shared about the change of his views on the Israeli/Palestinian issue and especially concerning settlements. I like how he described that Jewish children are indoctrinated as they are brought up and encouraged to join the army but they don't think what being in the army will actually entail until later. And then they follow orders largely without questioning. I agree with his views on the situation that it is amazing what people will accept and what orders they will follow depending on the information that they have been given. I think it can be extremely hard for people to break out of the bubbles that they or that society has created for them and as a result they are blind to the consequences of certain policies, ideals, or dehumanizations as the case may be. Be that as it may, it is still definitely wrong to kick people out of their houses. I agree that living populations should take precedence over the archaelogical diggings that may lay underneath them. If you started digging anywhere in this area, you are bound to find ruins. If they kick out the Palestinians for that reason, they also need to kick out Jewish families for the same reason. I am amazed at the optimism that Mori held despite the fact that he acknowledged that he is only (hopefully) laying the groundwork for future change. I don't know if there is a way in the immediate future to bring about a resolution to the conflict and the deep-seated mistrust that exists between the two sides. One way to start though is to have things clearly represented as what they are. I recognize that Mori was definitely far to one side in the argument, but at least he admitted his bias. The movie we watched yesterday about the City of David was a piece of heavy propaganda but it never admitted to being so. It only sought to indoctrinate and to brainwash. I like that he at least came out and stated several times that there are differing opinions and the he doesn't necessarily know the right way to do things. It made his ideas a lot easier to listen to.
Leah Settlement Lecture
These two lecture back-to-back was probably the highlight of all the many lectures that we have received on this trip so far. It was amazing to see the contrast in the discourses that each side presented. Each individual side believes that it is entirely correct and it makes logical sense to them why they carry out the actions that they do. They feel justified in their reasonings and in their decisions. Leah's lecture made a great deal of sense and I had to say I could see where she was coming from for the vast majority of her arguments and the information that she presented. Her reversal on the right to return and being kicked out definitely turned the Palestinian discourse a little bit. Jews were kicked out by Palestinians and Jordanians and were forced to flee under armed guard to other areas. They were exercising something like their right to return when they came back (although it wasn't necessarily the same family or even same community that moved back into the houses and they won't let the Palestinians have the same privilege so the parallel is weak at best). She had a good argument for everything that the other side would usually point out - Jews bring greater stability to an area because of the armed presence and the cameras, Jews bring prosperity and cleanliness, a melting pot city does have a nice ring to it when compared to being divided by barbed wire. However, all these were taken from her context and frame-of-view. I think it would be incredibly interesting to bring her and Mori together in a formal debate to go back and forth to see if they could get each other to see any of the other's points. I think there has to be a compromise made between the two sides somehow in order to reach any sort of agreement. I have to say that I agree way more with the Palestinian side and think they have been hugely mistreated and murdered and taken advantage of in every case. However, in order to reach stability and peace some amount of that has to be forgiven and moved past. I don't know where the balance would be though or even how to reach that point where the two sides would come into balance.
Peace Process Lecture
If anything, this peace process lecture given by both of you only cemented the fact that there is no immediate or easy end to this conflict or multi-faceted issue. There have been so many peace processes and semi-agreements that have gotten nowhere or had very little impact or result. People hold on to old treaties or ideals from past peace processes that seem to have little modern application anymore at this point. But they stubbornly hold on to somehow making them work at some point. But I wonder at what cost? When will people have to realize that a certain solution has become highly improbable and what point does the current situation reflect that reality? I think a two state solution might still be possible, but the way things are headed it certainly looks a lot more difficult than it ever did about twenty years ago. I have doubts about a two state solution though. For one thing, there would have to be a more equitable distribution of resources, especially water. Water is an extremely valuable commodity in this part of the world and Israel uses quite a bit. Palestine would have to be guaranteed a greater share in order to provide for the needs of its people. I don't know if Israel would really be willing to even make that concession to them if the time ever came to do so. Also, both sides would need a more equitable security force in order to keep the other from future invasions or armed border conflicts. I don't think Israel would allow Israel would allow Palestine to do that and would be ready to invade and reoccupy Palestine at any point in order to regain its hegemony, security, land, and resources. The two states might last for a little while, but I think eventually the system would collapse.
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
Bashir Lectures #1, 2, and 3
These are all my responses to the lectures we have received over the past few days. They were by a professor named Bashir Bashir who is a Palestinian who studies political science and teaches at the Hebrew University. He is an Israeli Arab, but he made his point very clear that he is a Palestinian. Again, I don't have the room to summarize what he said, only provide my response to it. Hopefully, you can kind of get his arguments from the context of my writings. I am posting these so you get a slight flavor of the "class" that I am taking while in Israel/Palestine which involves visiting a number of politically charged sites as well as listening to lectures done by academics on all sides of the debate.
Bashir Lecture #1 - The Stages of Palestinian Nationalism
I found the lecture to be very interesting and insightful. He definitely has different opinions and beliefs than a lot of the other things that I have seen, heard, or read that have to do with this conflict. Tracing the history of the Palestinian state movement through his eyes was extremely useful and I have to agree with a lot of what he had to say. However, I think each of those movements still plays a much larger role than he made it sound like. I feel like there are people entrenched within each of those movements that are not willing to let go of their ideologies and beliefs. They are strongly internalized and have become almost doctrine-like to how they live their live their lives. The majority of Palestinians might have changed their views and beliefs with the progressive movements or the leadership might have, but I think there is still a sizable part of the population that has not changed and perhaps will never change. They are a force to be reckoned with and I would like to know what kind of part they will play in the various ideas that he laid out.
Bashir Lecture #2 - Discourses
The way he presented his ideas on discourses was bold and quite different from the apologetic approaches taken by most professors or teachers I have had in the past. It was refreshing I thought. I agree with Bashir's ideas that the "peace-making" discourse is flawed from the outset because it supposes the two entities to be on a level playing field. Aside from lacking institutions among other things, the Palestinian Authority is not the legitimate government of Palestine in the eyes of many Palestinians and in the eyes of some of the international community. Working from this context will never be the stability that people want because the PA itself is not stable. On the other hand, I think he trivialized the humanitarian causes of the Palestinians too much though. If the Palestinians could find a way to use international media more to their advantage to publish their humanitarian plights, I think many would respond demanding that the Palestinians gain more rights and greater equality. I think that is evident with the recent war in Gaza - Instagram and Twitter and Facebook and other social media forms were utilized to show what was going on there and people around the world responded outraged. If Palestinians continue to use these newer forms of media to show the world their problems from their point of view (and not through the lens of Western media), there might be a way to bring great sympathy to their side. I think that is why there is greater sympathy already on the behalf of Europeans and more and more of the American public. Humanitarian discourse could become a tool to vastly improve the condition of Palestinians while waiting for the much more complicated and longer process of decolonization to take place.
Bashir Lecture #3 - Shifts
I feel this lecture was a lot more rushed due to timing and due to the fact that Bashir also felt he covered the material in his previous lectures. I agreed with the general ideas that he presented in this lecture. I believe that the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is shifting from being under USA control to international control. I think social media has led to major changes in the international playing field here as well. No longer does media censorship or bias govern what people hear and see, now they can get information right from the people on the street in the area where a crisis or war or whatever is happening. They get access to all the opinions and ideas as well as pictures, videos, memes, and so on. This puts the conflict in more of an international and public opinion context and not just in the hand of the elites of the government. I also agree that Palestinians should fight more for rights than for a state at this point. Forming two separate states would be kind of ridiculous at this point. The notion is nice, but the application would be brutal and complicated to the point of almost being impossible. I think again here that Palestine needs to ask for rights and appeal to the emotions and humanitarian tendencies of the people of the global community.
Bashir Lecture #1 - The Stages of Palestinian Nationalism
I found the lecture to be very interesting and insightful. He definitely has different opinions and beliefs than a lot of the other things that I have seen, heard, or read that have to do with this conflict. Tracing the history of the Palestinian state movement through his eyes was extremely useful and I have to agree with a lot of what he had to say. However, I think each of those movements still plays a much larger role than he made it sound like. I feel like there are people entrenched within each of those movements that are not willing to let go of their ideologies and beliefs. They are strongly internalized and have become almost doctrine-like to how they live their live their lives. The majority of Palestinians might have changed their views and beliefs with the progressive movements or the leadership might have, but I think there is still a sizable part of the population that has not changed and perhaps will never change. They are a force to be reckoned with and I would like to know what kind of part they will play in the various ideas that he laid out.
Bashir Lecture #2 - Discourses
The way he presented his ideas on discourses was bold and quite different from the apologetic approaches taken by most professors or teachers I have had in the past. It was refreshing I thought. I agree with Bashir's ideas that the "peace-making" discourse is flawed from the outset because it supposes the two entities to be on a level playing field. Aside from lacking institutions among other things, the Palestinian Authority is not the legitimate government of Palestine in the eyes of many Palestinians and in the eyes of some of the international community. Working from this context will never be the stability that people want because the PA itself is not stable. On the other hand, I think he trivialized the humanitarian causes of the Palestinians too much though. If the Palestinians could find a way to use international media more to their advantage to publish their humanitarian plights, I think many would respond demanding that the Palestinians gain more rights and greater equality. I think that is evident with the recent war in Gaza - Instagram and Twitter and Facebook and other social media forms were utilized to show what was going on there and people around the world responded outraged. If Palestinians continue to use these newer forms of media to show the world their problems from their point of view (and not through the lens of Western media), there might be a way to bring great sympathy to their side. I think that is why there is greater sympathy already on the behalf of Europeans and more and more of the American public. Humanitarian discourse could become a tool to vastly improve the condition of Palestinians while waiting for the much more complicated and longer process of decolonization to take place.
Bashir Lecture #3 - Shifts
I feel this lecture was a lot more rushed due to timing and due to the fact that Bashir also felt he covered the material in his previous lectures. I agreed with the general ideas that he presented in this lecture. I believe that the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is shifting from being under USA control to international control. I think social media has led to major changes in the international playing field here as well. No longer does media censorship or bias govern what people hear and see, now they can get information right from the people on the street in the area where a crisis or war or whatever is happening. They get access to all the opinions and ideas as well as pictures, videos, memes, and so on. This puts the conflict in more of an international and public opinion context and not just in the hand of the elites of the government. I also agree that Palestinians should fight more for rights than for a state at this point. Forming two separate states would be kind of ridiculous at this point. The notion is nice, but the application would be brutal and complicated to the point of almost being impossible. I think again here that Palestine needs to ask for rights and appeal to the emotions and humanitarian tendencies of the people of the global community.
Wednesday, December 10, 2014
Israeli Response Papers #5 and 6
Israeli Kibbutz
I really enjoyed the Israeli Kibbutz that we visited today. I will admit that growing up in a staunch Mormon Republican family that we always viewed socialism as one of the evils of the world. To be honest, bringing up the word or the idea was kind of a taboo thing in my family. It was nice to see what socialism can mean to a small group of people with strong determination and ideals and what they could make out of their collective efforts. They completely changed the desert into a thriving agricultural community. That is an amazing feat. I feel like our guide did an excellent job at presenting how the idealized life inside the kibbutz was and how with the same common goal that people could work together for the greater good. I also liked how he pointed out that the vast majority of kibbutzim are now changing to fit more in line with the capitalistic and materialistic economic machine. People are influenced by outside culture and events especially generations removed from the original pilgrims and settlers. They were brought up with the ideals of sharing all in common and then were given the freedom to choose to leave it. I like how the community works under a system of extreme democracy with a necessary 70% majority in order to get anything achieved. I feel like in a community that small, that is quite a great achievement. However, I feel like the ideas presented would never work on a larger or state scale. It is one thing to build the perfect community, but it would be quite another to build the perfect state. I cannot imagine any circumstance where that many people would work together for a greater collective good in such a diverse context. I believe the kibbutzim were an interesting social experiment that showed that socialism could work as a political and economic system in limited circumstances but the added variables of bigger populations or the added burden of globalization I think show that the world is not ready at this point for a more advanced social state or entity.
Eran Lecture on Israeli Politics
I feel like the lecture given by Eran really showed what had been said earlier that when you push any Israeli hard enough, they will always go back to the need for a Jewish state. His entire argument rested on this fact with his continued prolonged analogy of the different flavored “ice creams”. I also agree with what Dr. Mecham brought up about how many Israelis here and in Tel Aviv seem to be a great distance from the conflicts in West Bank or the Middle East. They have created this idealized bubble for themselves where life is pretty great and all things tend to work out. I guess you could say they made an oasis and then walls around it so they could let everything outside just deal with itself. I feel that many Palestinians feel the only option to have their grievances addressed is to gain the attention of Israel and the greater powers through the use of violence. Shooting rockets in Tel Aviv certainly brought greater attention to the daily struggle of the people living in Gaza. I can also see that in the mind of Israelis across the political spectrum that there is this greater underlying fear of Palestinians and Arabs or of being swept off into the sea and losing their state. I do not think this fear is justified by any means or makes sense. Nevertheless, it seems to persist in the mind of every Israeli Jew that I have spoken with and the need to keep up the security of the state and justifying current and past actions with this reasoning. I think the only way to break down this fear would be through education at an early age and individual experiences with the “other” that would break down barriers. I do not know if there would be a feasible way to put this plan into effect though. For the time being, violence speaks much louder and I think this will continue as the method to voice frustrations into the foreseeable future until something about the situation changes.
I really enjoyed the Israeli Kibbutz that we visited today. I will admit that growing up in a staunch Mormon Republican family that we always viewed socialism as one of the evils of the world. To be honest, bringing up the word or the idea was kind of a taboo thing in my family. It was nice to see what socialism can mean to a small group of people with strong determination and ideals and what they could make out of their collective efforts. They completely changed the desert into a thriving agricultural community. That is an amazing feat. I feel like our guide did an excellent job at presenting how the idealized life inside the kibbutz was and how with the same common goal that people could work together for the greater good. I also liked how he pointed out that the vast majority of kibbutzim are now changing to fit more in line with the capitalistic and materialistic economic machine. People are influenced by outside culture and events especially generations removed from the original pilgrims and settlers. They were brought up with the ideals of sharing all in common and then were given the freedom to choose to leave it. I like how the community works under a system of extreme democracy with a necessary 70% majority in order to get anything achieved. I feel like in a community that small, that is quite a great achievement. However, I feel like the ideas presented would never work on a larger or state scale. It is one thing to build the perfect community, but it would be quite another to build the perfect state. I cannot imagine any circumstance where that many people would work together for a greater collective good in such a diverse context. I believe the kibbutzim were an interesting social experiment that showed that socialism could work as a political and economic system in limited circumstances but the added variables of bigger populations or the added burden of globalization I think show that the world is not ready at this point for a more advanced social state or entity.
Eran Lecture on Israeli Politics
I feel like the lecture given by Eran really showed what had been said earlier that when you push any Israeli hard enough, they will always go back to the need for a Jewish state. His entire argument rested on this fact with his continued prolonged analogy of the different flavored “ice creams”. I also agree with what Dr. Mecham brought up about how many Israelis here and in Tel Aviv seem to be a great distance from the conflicts in West Bank or the Middle East. They have created this idealized bubble for themselves where life is pretty great and all things tend to work out. I guess you could say they made an oasis and then walls around it so they could let everything outside just deal with itself. I feel that many Palestinians feel the only option to have their grievances addressed is to gain the attention of Israel and the greater powers through the use of violence. Shooting rockets in Tel Aviv certainly brought greater attention to the daily struggle of the people living in Gaza. I can also see that in the mind of Israelis across the political spectrum that there is this greater underlying fear of Palestinians and Arabs or of being swept off into the sea and losing their state. I do not think this fear is justified by any means or makes sense. Nevertheless, it seems to persist in the mind of every Israeli Jew that I have spoken with and the need to keep up the security of the state and justifying current and past actions with this reasoning. I think the only way to break down this fear would be through education at an early age and individual experiences with the “other” that would break down barriers. I do not know if there would be a feasible way to put this plan into effect though. For the time being, violence speaks much louder and I think this will continue as the method to voice frustrations into the foreseeable future until something about the situation changes.
Tuesday, December 9, 2014
Last Week, Toughest Week
Well, this is it. I have two days left in the great country of Jordan and then we head to Palestine/Israel. I can’t believe how fast the time has flown as I guess I have written many times before. This past week was a myriad of tests, shopping, eating, cleaning, packing, and trying to get everything set to go. I have decided I will take another two or three tests over packing, I HATE packing like none other. It is absolutely the worst part of any trip or semester. That and saying goodbye to people. Both of those things are terrible. And I don’t want to do either, but I must.
Anyway, here is quick on the rundown on the tests that I have been taking this week. About a week and a half ago, the madness started with the OPI that I wrote about last week. Sunday, we took a listening test where we had to listen to three different recordings and answer questions about them. It actually wasn’t too bad and I understood the vast majority of what was going on. The next day was a test on the colloquial aspect of the language. We had two listening sections and one voweling/put the stress on the right syllable section. Not as easy as the first test, but not bad either. The next day brought what we have prepared for all semester. He pulled 10 random paragraphs from 10 of the articles that we read earlier this semester. We had to translate them word-for-word and achieve perfection. I think that was the easiest test we had of all. After that, we took a two-part test with one section for reading comprehension with four new articles and one with four new articles to translate. Then there was a reading and listening test on the computer to rate where our level is at. Then there was another OPI, this one face-to-face with one of the Qasid teachers. We finally finished up on Thursday.
Other than taking tests and studying for tests, I have been getting all my last minute food eating in. I have had kofta twice this week. It is kind of like Jordanian meatloaf swimming in a delicious tahini sauce. I got it from two different restaurants, one was with a guy named Hashem that I got to know this week. He is really awesome. So good. I also had kunafa again a few times, hot and fresh and delicious. Today, I went with some friends to someone’s house up in Al-Hosn after church there and had mansaf, which I also had earlier in the week from Mat’am Al-Quds. So much good food and still more to get in the next two day. I also need to see some last minute sights that I haven’t gotten to yet with the limited time remaining like the big mosque, maybe the children’s museum, the Citadel. And finish making all my gifts to give to friends and finish everything else.
I also went to karaoke this week and that was a blast as well as hit up Mockingjay at the cinema with some friends. I don’t think it has quite settled in yet that I only have a couple days left here and then I have no idea when I will see these people again. I am in still in some sort of denial stage. It might not hit me until we are being questioned at the border so that we can get across. Speaking of which, I have to decide how to pack everything so that all my Arab stuff stays behind – the books, clothes, study guides, notebooks, etc. We aren’t allowed to take any of them because they make the Israeli border guards very suspicious.
Ok, so I ran out of the time, patience, whatever to finish this blogpost when I started it. So I will try to do so now keeping the perspective before I left Jordan for Israel. Bear with me though, I honestly hate writing about goodbyes and the sadness of packing.
As for packing, I did it and it sucked as always. There you go. I hope I can manage to get my suitcases to weigh under the limit and to do so I might be getting rid of most of my clothes. Since they all reek of cigarette smoke or the argeela smoke I don’t think I will miss them all that terribly. Plus none of them was real in fashion or my favorite clothes anyway. Throwing things away is the easy part of packing, I can now say that for absolute certain. On the other hand, wrapping all the fragiles in paper and tape and securing them within soft materials for protection is tedious and boring. However, for the sake of the amount of money that I have spent, I did it anyway and hopefully everything makes it through without a scratch. Enough of that dumb topic.
Saying the goodbyes was the single worst experience I can think of from the past few years of my life. I can honestly say I do not believe that I will see some of these people ever again and I have gotten to be really good friends with some of them. I have laughed with them, joked with them, had deep conversations with them and now leaving kind of just rips all that apart. I have to say that I am thankful for the blessing of social media that we can maintain some kind of connection with each other. Still, that will not ever be quite the same and saying goodbye cemented that fact into my brain. I am going to miss Lucy, Deen, my teachers, Haneen, my presentation and writing teachers, and so many others. I could list quite a few. Also, attending the Al-Husn Branch. Going back to a regular church in a couple weeks will be a tremendous shock to my system (and not only because it happens on Sunday and not Friday). I hope to one day return to this great country. That day might even be soon, but I just do not know. Alright, I can’t write anymore about this depressing stuff; I have to move on.
I did get to visit the Citadel and various restaurants and places the last couple days of my stay. The Citadel was a much larger complex than I expected. It was huge and amazing and green because of the rains. Don’t get me wrong, the desert has its beauty, but the greenery certainly adds a nice flair to everything. Like all ruins, the Citadel is made of a conglomerate of materials and civilizations from throughout history. One people would build on the ruins of the people previous and repurpose some of the old architecture to suit their needs and so one throughout the centuries. It sure makes it intriguing to see upside down Roman statues or columns used in Byzantine churches or Umayyad palaces. You can also see lots of Amman from the top of the hill. You can gain a nice understanding of the city and the placement of the important sites within it by going to all the different side of the hill and reading the posted map and diagram that accompanies each one. It was a great end to my Amman experience to look at the different parts of town and think of what I had done there as well as who I had met there.
I also visited the olive wood shop in the industry section of Amman in order to buy Nativities. Lucky for me, they had a sale going on lots of the Nativities that I was looking at that saved me a tremendous amount of money. I don’t want to give it away, but I think some people will greatly enjoy their Christmas presents back home.
Sorry guys that is about all I can write on this week. It was not my favorite week in Amman because of saying goodbyes and the testing. I am excited to visit Palestine/Israel the next two weeks and visit all the Holy Sites before Christmas!
Anyway, here is quick on the rundown on the tests that I have been taking this week. About a week and a half ago, the madness started with the OPI that I wrote about last week. Sunday, we took a listening test where we had to listen to three different recordings and answer questions about them. It actually wasn’t too bad and I understood the vast majority of what was going on. The next day was a test on the colloquial aspect of the language. We had two listening sections and one voweling/put the stress on the right syllable section. Not as easy as the first test, but not bad either. The next day brought what we have prepared for all semester. He pulled 10 random paragraphs from 10 of the articles that we read earlier this semester. We had to translate them word-for-word and achieve perfection. I think that was the easiest test we had of all. After that, we took a two-part test with one section for reading comprehension with four new articles and one with four new articles to translate. Then there was a reading and listening test on the computer to rate where our level is at. Then there was another OPI, this one face-to-face with one of the Qasid teachers. We finally finished up on Thursday.
Other than taking tests and studying for tests, I have been getting all my last minute food eating in. I have had kofta twice this week. It is kind of like Jordanian meatloaf swimming in a delicious tahini sauce. I got it from two different restaurants, one was with a guy named Hashem that I got to know this week. He is really awesome. So good. I also had kunafa again a few times, hot and fresh and delicious. Today, I went with some friends to someone’s house up in Al-Hosn after church there and had mansaf, which I also had earlier in the week from Mat’am Al-Quds. So much good food and still more to get in the next two day. I also need to see some last minute sights that I haven’t gotten to yet with the limited time remaining like the big mosque, maybe the children’s museum, the Citadel. And finish making all my gifts to give to friends and finish everything else.
I also went to karaoke this week and that was a blast as well as hit up Mockingjay at the cinema with some friends. I don’t think it has quite settled in yet that I only have a couple days left here and then I have no idea when I will see these people again. I am in still in some sort of denial stage. It might not hit me until we are being questioned at the border so that we can get across. Speaking of which, I have to decide how to pack everything so that all my Arab stuff stays behind – the books, clothes, study guides, notebooks, etc. We aren’t allowed to take any of them because they make the Israeli border guards very suspicious.
Ok, so I ran out of the time, patience, whatever to finish this blogpost when I started it. So I will try to do so now keeping the perspective before I left Jordan for Israel. Bear with me though, I honestly hate writing about goodbyes and the sadness of packing.
As for packing, I did it and it sucked as always. There you go. I hope I can manage to get my suitcases to weigh under the limit and to do so I might be getting rid of most of my clothes. Since they all reek of cigarette smoke or the argeela smoke I don’t think I will miss them all that terribly. Plus none of them was real in fashion or my favorite clothes anyway. Throwing things away is the easy part of packing, I can now say that for absolute certain. On the other hand, wrapping all the fragiles in paper and tape and securing them within soft materials for protection is tedious and boring. However, for the sake of the amount of money that I have spent, I did it anyway and hopefully everything makes it through without a scratch. Enough of that dumb topic.
Saying the goodbyes was the single worst experience I can think of from the past few years of my life. I can honestly say I do not believe that I will see some of these people ever again and I have gotten to be really good friends with some of them. I have laughed with them, joked with them, had deep conversations with them and now leaving kind of just rips all that apart. I have to say that I am thankful for the blessing of social media that we can maintain some kind of connection with each other. Still, that will not ever be quite the same and saying goodbye cemented that fact into my brain. I am going to miss Lucy, Deen, my teachers, Haneen, my presentation and writing teachers, and so many others. I could list quite a few. Also, attending the Al-Husn Branch. Going back to a regular church in a couple weeks will be a tremendous shock to my system (and not only because it happens on Sunday and not Friday). I hope to one day return to this great country. That day might even be soon, but I just do not know. Alright, I can’t write anymore about this depressing stuff; I have to move on.
I did get to visit the Citadel and various restaurants and places the last couple days of my stay. The Citadel was a much larger complex than I expected. It was huge and amazing and green because of the rains. Don’t get me wrong, the desert has its beauty, but the greenery certainly adds a nice flair to everything. Like all ruins, the Citadel is made of a conglomerate of materials and civilizations from throughout history. One people would build on the ruins of the people previous and repurpose some of the old architecture to suit their needs and so one throughout the centuries. It sure makes it intriguing to see upside down Roman statues or columns used in Byzantine churches or Umayyad palaces. You can also see lots of Amman from the top of the hill. You can gain a nice understanding of the city and the placement of the important sites within it by going to all the different side of the hill and reading the posted map and diagram that accompanies each one. It was a great end to my Amman experience to look at the different parts of town and think of what I had done there as well as who I had met there.
I also visited the olive wood shop in the industry section of Amman in order to buy Nativities. Lucky for me, they had a sale going on lots of the Nativities that I was looking at that saved me a tremendous amount of money. I don’t want to give it away, but I think some people will greatly enjoy their Christmas presents back home.
Sorry guys that is about all I can write on this week. It was not my favorite week in Amman because of saying goodbyes and the testing. I am excited to visit Palestine/Israel the next two weeks and visit all the Holy Sites before Christmas!
Response Papers #1-4 For Israeli Visit
Hey guys! For our class assignments, we have to write a response paper about some of the different lecture we attended or activities that we did. I figured since I am already writing them I might as well post them here as well so you all can follow what I am learning about or experiencing. I still plan on writing an overall cohesive wrap-up of this whole Israel experience. But this way, you can read shorter, more intensive tidbits for the time beaing. Each one is titled for the person who gave the lecture, the title of the lecture, or the site visited. Hope you enjoy!
Israeli History Lecture
Being a MESA major, I always hear about the Arab side of things. I guess that makes sense considering that Arabic is included in the name of the field of study. That being understood, most of the classes I have taken tend to swing heavily toward the Arab/Palestinian side of the conflict. We might cover the Israeli ideals in a day or two, but never enough to give it justice. Or to balance out the time spent studying the other side. It was refreshing to hear about the Israeli perspective and Israeli settlements on this trip for quite a while and to break down some of the prejudices and judgments that I had been unconsciously building up over the last few years. I can understand the Israeli struggle better now. They truly felt that they had to create their own country to protect themselves. They faced persecution on every side, and all of it led up to the mass execution that was the Holocaust. Fearing for their lives, families, culture, traditions, and religion, what other choice did they have? They were not receiving support from any particular side, so they set out to defend themselves in a logical fashion by creating a state just for them. After the world witnessed the atrocities of the concentration camps, they agreed to support the Jews in their goal for a state to make some amends for the dreadful harm that occurred. That ongoing fear of another Holocaust happening has truly played a large role in all Israeli policies and practices. They are doing everything they can to guarantee their security, and I can understand why. By having a strong, independent state, they can guarantee their own safety without have to turn to world superpowers to be rejected again and can offer refuge to those who are being persecuted in places around the world. That being said, Jews need to adapt to the reality of the current times. I do not think that the world would allow Israel to be destroyed anymore. They would step in and rescue it. Israel needs to relax a little bit and allow greater freedoms and qualities to all those that live within her borders.
Independence Hall Visit
Visiting the Independence Hall in Tel Aviv today was an interesting experience. Before we got there, I picture it in my mind to be a big, grandiose government building comparable to the one in D.C. or other countries. I was very surprised to see it was an old concrete house that did nothing to draw attention to itself. Stepping inside, I was expecting to have to go through metal detectors or some sort of security. But I was again surprised when there were almost no security measures. I finally began to understand when our guide started to speak and turned the movie on that this was not a tourist destination or an attempt to win over more supporters. It was a place to cultivate an already strong belief in the state of Israel or to educate youth about how the country came to be. The whole presentation was insightful for me because of the word choice that was used as well as the manner in which the information was presented. Everything was done on the foundation of the fact that Israel was always in the right. There was very little to no mention of the other side of the conflict’s views because in Israel’s mind they do not make any sense or do not exist. The purpose of the tour and presentation is to build up people’s fires and faith in the country and inspire them to go on and continue the cause, and I think it does a wonderful job at fulfilling its purpose. I did like how the room where the Declaration of Independence was announced was set up. It was made to resemble the original room with exactness complete with old microphones and the paintings for decoration on the wall. It made the whole visit seem more authentic. I also learned that the announcement of the Declaration was supposed to be a secret, with only about 350 people in attendance. However, word spread like a wildfire and there were thousands more crammed on the streets than that. I also gained a greater appreciation for what this means for Jews. Our guide said everything so matter-of-fact because he believed everything to be a fact. There was no room for political debate because he believed with his whole fiber that everything that he presented was true. I do not know if the other side and its reasoning had ever crept into his mind. If a lot of Jews think and believe like he does, it explains a lot about how the state of Israel acts and the policies that it implements.
Uzi Rabi Lecture
Uzi Rabi was a great lecturer who put the Arab Spring and its results in a whole new light from what I had previously considered. He brought up the fact that the United States and Israel and the Western world in general were using the Middle East in its 20th Century context as a means to solve the current conflicts, wars, and problems. They are not willing to adapt fully to what reality is actually occurring on the ground in the states of Syria, Iraq, Libya, and Yemen. I have to say that I kind of agree with his analysis in this aspect. I feel like the United States is using the same tools and strategies that led to so many problems in the first place. We need to take a fresh approach and realize that putting everything back together just the way that it was may not be the best option for approach or even possible or likely to happen at this point. The four aforementioned states are divided at this point between so many actors and parties that stability might not come to the region for many years to come. I do not know that I agree with him on his analysis of the death of the nation state in the Middle East though. I still think that Jordan, Iran, the Gulf states, and Morocco show that Middle Eastern states still carry a sense of nationalism and meaning. Jordanians were still very proud to be Jordanian and made sure to mention that fact whenever I talked with them the past few months. I think in the examples of the failed states like Iraq or Syria, people are hesitant to identify with the state for the sake of the political implications as well as having a lack of faith in the state’s ability to provide for their needs and security. So they move to the next logical identifier that works for them, whether that be religion or ethnicity or something else entirely. People need an identity and a group to belong to. In the absence of a strong state, they move to the next viable option. I also liked his point about education being the key to unlocking the next generation’s capacity to resolve the conflicts and build relationships of understanding and eventually trust with one another. I have to agree that the best way to learn about a people, culture, or country is to actually go and live there for a while. Get to know the people in a personal way and the results will always surprise you. No studying of texts or eloquent debates will provide the learning of conversing with the people and getting to know them and the way that they perceive life. I believe it would greatly reduce conflicts around the world if this was a viable option in education systems. Sadly, I do not think it can be realistically applied. The cost is prohibitive on top of the fact that many parents would be unwilling to let their children go in fear of their safety or being brainwashed. I put more faith in people connecting through the internet and social media. Meeting people in this forum can lead to the same understanding and respect as doing it in person. As time goes on, I believe that communication will improve using these methods as well. I think that is the way to truly break down the barriers that is leading to the “clash of civilizations” that Uzi addressed this evening.
Israeli Settlements
Settlements are a way to increase the security of Israel. It puts people in the West Bank around the Palestinians and breaks up the Palestinian people from one another. By using the A, B, and C zones, Israel seems to be slowly handing over authority to those living in the West Bank. However, Israel never went through with upgrading the zones over the years that followed and the first and second intifadahs lead to greater mistrust and fear. Israel believes that it is looking out for its own interests by settling the West Bank because, in its mind, it is a part of the state and there should be no argument about it. They have every right to live there the same as the Palestinians. They also use the strategy of dividing up the A zones with C or B zones so that Palestinians have difficulty moving from one place to another. They do all these things to protect themselves from perceived threats as well as take back all the land that they see as historically and rightfully theirs. Jerusalem, Qumran, and other cities or sites have spiritual, religious, and historical value that the Jews wish to preserve and keep in their own state. That being said, it is in violation of the international agreements that they have made and somehow they need to start keeping them.
Israeli History Lecture
Being a MESA major, I always hear about the Arab side of things. I guess that makes sense considering that Arabic is included in the name of the field of study. That being understood, most of the classes I have taken tend to swing heavily toward the Arab/Palestinian side of the conflict. We might cover the Israeli ideals in a day or two, but never enough to give it justice. Or to balance out the time spent studying the other side. It was refreshing to hear about the Israeli perspective and Israeli settlements on this trip for quite a while and to break down some of the prejudices and judgments that I had been unconsciously building up over the last few years. I can understand the Israeli struggle better now. They truly felt that they had to create their own country to protect themselves. They faced persecution on every side, and all of it led up to the mass execution that was the Holocaust. Fearing for their lives, families, culture, traditions, and religion, what other choice did they have? They were not receiving support from any particular side, so they set out to defend themselves in a logical fashion by creating a state just for them. After the world witnessed the atrocities of the concentration camps, they agreed to support the Jews in their goal for a state to make some amends for the dreadful harm that occurred. That ongoing fear of another Holocaust happening has truly played a large role in all Israeli policies and practices. They are doing everything they can to guarantee their security, and I can understand why. By having a strong, independent state, they can guarantee their own safety without have to turn to world superpowers to be rejected again and can offer refuge to those who are being persecuted in places around the world. That being said, Jews need to adapt to the reality of the current times. I do not think that the world would allow Israel to be destroyed anymore. They would step in and rescue it. Israel needs to relax a little bit and allow greater freedoms and qualities to all those that live within her borders.
Independence Hall Visit
Visiting the Independence Hall in Tel Aviv today was an interesting experience. Before we got there, I picture it in my mind to be a big, grandiose government building comparable to the one in D.C. or other countries. I was very surprised to see it was an old concrete house that did nothing to draw attention to itself. Stepping inside, I was expecting to have to go through metal detectors or some sort of security. But I was again surprised when there were almost no security measures. I finally began to understand when our guide started to speak and turned the movie on that this was not a tourist destination or an attempt to win over more supporters. It was a place to cultivate an already strong belief in the state of Israel or to educate youth about how the country came to be. The whole presentation was insightful for me because of the word choice that was used as well as the manner in which the information was presented. Everything was done on the foundation of the fact that Israel was always in the right. There was very little to no mention of the other side of the conflict’s views because in Israel’s mind they do not make any sense or do not exist. The purpose of the tour and presentation is to build up people’s fires and faith in the country and inspire them to go on and continue the cause, and I think it does a wonderful job at fulfilling its purpose. I did like how the room where the Declaration of Independence was announced was set up. It was made to resemble the original room with exactness complete with old microphones and the paintings for decoration on the wall. It made the whole visit seem more authentic. I also learned that the announcement of the Declaration was supposed to be a secret, with only about 350 people in attendance. However, word spread like a wildfire and there were thousands more crammed on the streets than that. I also gained a greater appreciation for what this means for Jews. Our guide said everything so matter-of-fact because he believed everything to be a fact. There was no room for political debate because he believed with his whole fiber that everything that he presented was true. I do not know if the other side and its reasoning had ever crept into his mind. If a lot of Jews think and believe like he does, it explains a lot about how the state of Israel acts and the policies that it implements.
Uzi Rabi Lecture
Uzi Rabi was a great lecturer who put the Arab Spring and its results in a whole new light from what I had previously considered. He brought up the fact that the United States and Israel and the Western world in general were using the Middle East in its 20th Century context as a means to solve the current conflicts, wars, and problems. They are not willing to adapt fully to what reality is actually occurring on the ground in the states of Syria, Iraq, Libya, and Yemen. I have to say that I kind of agree with his analysis in this aspect. I feel like the United States is using the same tools and strategies that led to so many problems in the first place. We need to take a fresh approach and realize that putting everything back together just the way that it was may not be the best option for approach or even possible or likely to happen at this point. The four aforementioned states are divided at this point between so many actors and parties that stability might not come to the region for many years to come. I do not know that I agree with him on his analysis of the death of the nation state in the Middle East though. I still think that Jordan, Iran, the Gulf states, and Morocco show that Middle Eastern states still carry a sense of nationalism and meaning. Jordanians were still very proud to be Jordanian and made sure to mention that fact whenever I talked with them the past few months. I think in the examples of the failed states like Iraq or Syria, people are hesitant to identify with the state for the sake of the political implications as well as having a lack of faith in the state’s ability to provide for their needs and security. So they move to the next logical identifier that works for them, whether that be religion or ethnicity or something else entirely. People need an identity and a group to belong to. In the absence of a strong state, they move to the next viable option. I also liked his point about education being the key to unlocking the next generation’s capacity to resolve the conflicts and build relationships of understanding and eventually trust with one another. I have to agree that the best way to learn about a people, culture, or country is to actually go and live there for a while. Get to know the people in a personal way and the results will always surprise you. No studying of texts or eloquent debates will provide the learning of conversing with the people and getting to know them and the way that they perceive life. I believe it would greatly reduce conflicts around the world if this was a viable option in education systems. Sadly, I do not think it can be realistically applied. The cost is prohibitive on top of the fact that many parents would be unwilling to let their children go in fear of their safety or being brainwashed. I put more faith in people connecting through the internet and social media. Meeting people in this forum can lead to the same understanding and respect as doing it in person. As time goes on, I believe that communication will improve using these methods as well. I think that is the way to truly break down the barriers that is leading to the “clash of civilizations” that Uzi addressed this evening.
Israeli Settlements
Settlements are a way to increase the security of Israel. It puts people in the West Bank around the Palestinians and breaks up the Palestinian people from one another. By using the A, B, and C zones, Israel seems to be slowly handing over authority to those living in the West Bank. However, Israel never went through with upgrading the zones over the years that followed and the first and second intifadahs lead to greater mistrust and fear. Israel believes that it is looking out for its own interests by settling the West Bank because, in its mind, it is a part of the state and there should be no argument about it. They have every right to live there the same as the Palestinians. They also use the strategy of dividing up the A zones with C or B zones so that Palestinians have difficulty moving from one place to another. They do all these things to protect themselves from perceived threats as well as take back all the land that they see as historically and rightfully theirs. Jerusalem, Qumran, and other cities or sites have spiritual, religious, and historical value that the Jews wish to preserve and keep in their own state. That being said, it is in violation of the international agreements that they have made and somehow they need to start keeping them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
